<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Orange Roundtable: Week 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/</link>
	<description>Life, the Universe, and the Bounce of the Ball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEC Power Poll: Preseason &#124; Gate 21</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>SEC Power Poll: Preseason &#124; Gate 21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>[...] discussed my reasons for choosing Croom as the best in Week 4 of the Big Orange Roundtable (Question 5).  In that response, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed my reasons for choosing Croom as the best in Week 4 of the Big Orange Roundtable (Question 5).  In that response, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky Top Talk</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky Top Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>RTT&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockytoptalk.com/2008/7/31/582664/the-oracle-is-missing-big&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RTT&#8217;s <a href="http://www.rockytoptalk.com/2008/7/31/582664/the-oracle-is-missing-big" rel="nofollow">response</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooper</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that I&#039;ll technically be &quot;pulling&quot; for anybody.  Nobody is going to expect Wyoming to win, unless UT comes in with an atrocious losing record and Wyoming comes in undefeated (and even then, it&#039;d be close).

What I most hope for is a quality game from both teams.  That sounds corny as heck, but follow me on this.  Wyoming&#039;s only real bowl hope is to get an automatic bid (they didn&#039;t get a bid when they went 10-2 and ranked as high as 13 in 1997 - the same year Notre Dame declined a bowl game because they were a mere 8-3 and didn&#039;t think they got a high enough bid).  The UT game does nothing for Wyo&#039;s bowl chances since it&#039;s OOC.  UT, however, must win.  Though it doesn&#039;t alter SEC standings, losing would destroy their high-end bowl hopes.

I guess the winning scenario would be a win by UT with both teams coming in respectable and both teams playing a great game.  But I&#039;m not going to be disappointed for the loser, so long as the game is good.

And I still despise Notre Dame for their bowl snobbery that year.  That one hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;ll technically be &#8220;pulling&#8221; for anybody.  Nobody is going to expect Wyoming to win, unless UT comes in with an atrocious losing record and Wyoming comes in undefeated (and even then, it&#8217;d be close).</p>
<p>What I most hope for is a quality game from both teams.  That sounds corny as heck, but follow me on this.  Wyoming&#8217;s only real bowl hope is to get an automatic bid (they didn&#8217;t get a bid when they went 10-2 and ranked as high as 13 in 1997 &#8211; the same year Notre Dame declined a bowl game because they were a mere 8-3 and didn&#8217;t think they got a high enough bid).  The UT game does nothing for Wyo&#8217;s bowl chances since it&#8217;s OOC.  UT, however, must win.  Though it doesn&#8217;t alter SEC standings, losing would destroy their high-end bowl hopes.</p>
<p>I guess the winning scenario would be a win by UT with both teams coming in respectable and both teams playing a great game.  But I&#8217;m not going to be disappointed for the loser, so long as the game is good.</p>
<p>And I still despise Notre Dame for their bowl snobbery that year.  That one hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The World According to MoonDog</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>The World According to MoonDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Big Orange Roundtable Vol(ume) 4...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Big Orange roundtable shifts to Gate 21 this week where the Godfather of graphic design, LawVol, serves as our master of ceremonies. 
I believe in keeping things simple and this week&#8217;s answers are concise and to the point. 
Below you&#8217;ll...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Big Orange Roundtable Vol(ume) 4&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Big Orange roundtable shifts to Gate 21 this week where the Godfather of graphic design, LawVol, serves as our master of ceremonies.<br />
I believe in keeping things simple and this week&#8217;s answers are concise and to the point.<br />
Below you&#8217;ll&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Orange Roundtable: Week 4 &#171; Third Saturday in Blogtober</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Orange Roundtable: Week 4 &#171; Third Saturday in Blogtober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>[...] already stretched and am ready to take on the challenge. LawVol at Gate 21 is this week&#8217;s king of the table and although it appears it has slightly gone to his head, he managed to come up with some great [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already stretched and am ready to take on the challenge. LawVol at Gate 21 is this week&#8217;s king of the table and although it appears it has slightly gone to his head, he managed to come up with some great [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawvol</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>lawvol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>So, Hooper, who you gonna be pulling for?  No shame in pulling for your alma mater...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Hooper, who you gonna be pulling for?  No shame in pulling for your alma mater&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooper</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>Much as I hope for Wyoming to make a bowl, it&#039;s close to impossible for the MWC to send 4 teams.  If BYU, Utah and TCU have 3, Wyoming will be left out - particularly because they&#039;re a smaller school.

And yes, I&#039;m looking forward to the color clash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much as I hope for Wyoming to make a bowl, it&#8217;s close to impossible for the MWC to send 4 teams.  If BYU, Utah and TCU have 3, Wyoming will be left out &#8211; particularly because they&#8217;re a smaller school.</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;m looking forward to the color clash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbrown16</title>
		<link>http://gate21.net/2008/07/28/big-orange-roundtable-week-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>pbrown16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gate21.net/?p=551#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>Wyoming could make a bowl this year - behind BYU, Utah, and TCU the MWC is up-for-grabs this year and they get three winnable non-conference home games as well...that said we should still roll them...

talk about a color clash...brown/gold amidst orange? almost as interesting as it will be for the upcoming Oregon games in a couple years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wyoming could make a bowl this year &#8211; behind BYU, Utah, and TCU the MWC is up-for-grabs this year and they get three winnable non-conference home games as well&#8230;that said we should still roll them&#8230;</p>
<p>talk about a color clash&#8230;brown/gold amidst orange? almost as interesting as it will be for the upcoming Oregon games in a couple years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
